PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161108 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 12 '22 at 08:55 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 84% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-7500-$1,334
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
75% 128 Pts
|
38% 289 Pts
|
20% 317 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$1,648
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
71.5%
Very good
|
74% 87.6 fps
|
69% 88.3 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$824
694GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1029 946 958 987 1008 995 MB/s
|
243%
Outstanding
|
370% 1,641 MB/s
|
244% 82.6 MB/s
|
564% 777 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$361
561GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 148 132 144 146 135 MB/s
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
97% 133 MB/s
|
80% 0.7 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hds721010kla33r RSD HUA 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: GKAOA9JA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 58 58 58 56 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
38% 51.3 MB/s
|
178% 1.2 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
61.8%
Good
|
62% 21.6 GB/s
|
53% 18.4 GB/s
|
59% 68.1 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
73% | 25% | 92 | 197 | 28 | 144 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | ACR077B EG240Y |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $1,178Bench 69%, 235,247 samples | 337x |
Core i5-7500Intel $1,334Bench 74%, 158,961 samples | 286x |
Core i7-7700Intel $2,174Bench 78%, 245,946 samples | 162x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $900Bench 31%, 1,036,829 samples | 250x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $453Bench 57%, 1,387,999 samples | 158x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $1,805Bench 53%, 586,807 samples | 101x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $3,228 |