Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 08:56
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$1,020
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 136
58% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 365
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$453
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 64.2
52% 66.5 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 64.5
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$408
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 474
Write 433
Mixed 429
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 49
159% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 5.6
74% 176 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$204
635GB free
Firmware: CC49
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 179
Write 136
Mixed 85.5
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$31
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 39.3
Write 7.2
Mixed 1.7
13% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.8
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 8 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $1,302

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $3,560
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $33
Intel Core i7-12700K $340Nvidia RTX 3070 $530Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 3050 $297Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $59SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $453SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback